Sunday, October 16, 2011

6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel

##title##
The previous standard NATO rifle cartridge was the 7.62×51mm NATO, derived from the .308 Winchester rifle cartridge and designed to replace the U.S. military's .30-06 Springfield rifle cartridge. At the time of selection, there had been criticism that the 7.62 mm was too powerful for modern service rifles, causing excessive recoil, and that the weight of the ammunition did not allow for enough rate of fire in modern combat.


The British had extensive evidence with their own experiments into an intermediate cartridge since 1945 and were on the point of introducing a .280 inch (7 mm) cartridge when the selection of the 7.62 mm NATO was made. The FN company had also been involved. The concerns about recoil and effectiveness were effectively overruled by the US within NATO, and the other NATO nations accepted that standardization was more important at the time than selection of the ideal cartridge. However the concerns would prove to be valid and led to the development of the 5.56 cartridge.


During the 1970s, NATO members signed an agreement to select a second, smaller caliber cartridge to replace the 7.62 mm NATO cartridge. Of the cartridges tendered, the 5.56x45mm was successful, but not the 55 gr M193 round used by the U.S. at that time. The wounds produced by the M193 round were so devastating that many consider it to be inhumane. Instead, the Belgian 62 gr SS109 round was chosen for standardization. The SS109 used a heavier bullet with a steel core and had a lower muzzle velocity for better long-range performance, specifically to meet a requirement that the bullet be able to penetrate through one side of a steel helmet at 600 meters. This requirement made the SS109 (M855) round less capable of fragmentation than the M193 and was considered more humane


The 5.56×45mm NATO cartridge with the standard military ball bullet (NATO: SS109; U.S.: M855) will penetrate approximately 15 to 20 in (38 to 51 cm) into soft tissue in ideal circumstances. As with all spitzer shaped projectiles it is prone to yaw in soft tissue. However, at impact velocities above roughly 2,500 ft/s (760 m/s), it may yaw and then fragment at the cannelure (the crimping groove around the cylinder of the bullet). These fragments can disperse through flesh and bone, inflicting additional internal injuries.





6.5 Grendel vs. 6.8 SPC



6.5 Grendel vs. 6.8 SPC



6.5 Grendel Versus 6.8 SPC



7.62x51mm NATO, 6.5mm Grendel



6.8 SPC, 6.5 Grendel,



6.8spc. 5.56mm 6.5 Grendel



6.5 Grendel vs. 6.8 SPC:



I got that off 6.8 SPC



6.5 Grendel vs. 6.8 SPC



6.8SPC Vs. 6.5 Grendel



6.8 Remington SPC



6.8SPC Vs. 6.5 Grendel replacement for 5.56



Your talking 6.8spc not 6.5



7.62x39,6.8SPC,6.5Grendel



6.5 Grendel vs 6.8 SPC,



parent 6.5 Grendel case.


2 comments: